report
2.7 References:

Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Arnall, Alexander Huw, “Future Technologies, Today’s Choices; Nanotechnology, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, A technical, political and institutional map of emerging technologies,” Greenpeace Environmental Trust, London, 2003, http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/MultimediaFiles/Live/FullReport/5886.pdf

Bauer, C., Buchgeister, J., Hischier, R., Poganietz, W. R., Schebek, L., & Warsen, J. (2008). Towards a framework for life cycle thinking in the assessment of nanotechnology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8-9), 910-926.

Bawa, R, “Patents and Nanomedicine,” in Nanomedicine, 2(3), 351-374, 2007, http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/fm/nnm/2007/00000002/00000003/art00010

BEUC, “Work programme 2009,” BEUC, Brussels, 5 January 2009, http://docshare.beuc.org/docs/3/LFNHCGLDHGJJAOCBHOHLDJALPDBG9DBDC19DW3571KM/BEUC/docs/DLS/2009-00085-01-E.pdf

Bijker, W. E., de Beaufort, I. D., van den Berg, A., Borm, P. J. A., Oyen, W. J. G., Robillard, G. T., et al. (2007). A response to 'Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance' O. Renn & M. C. Roco, 2006. J. Nanoparticle Research 8(2): 153-191. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9(6), 1217-1220.

Bowman, Diana M, “Patently Obvious. Intellectual Property Rights and Nanotechnology,” in Technology in Society, 29: 307-315, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V80-4NXGSF0-1&_user=10&_coverDate=08%2F31%2F2007&_alid=857008020&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=search&_cdi=5856&_docanchor=&view=c&_ct=1&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=2f1145cd19a6ed3a6de89daffcf0cca8

Braxton, J. (1994). Perspectives on Research Misconduct. Journal of Higher Education (Vol. 65). Colombus, OH: Ohio State University.

Brundtland Commission (1987). Our Common Future, Chapter 2: Towards Sustainable Development. UN Documents  Retrieved 29 March, 2009, from http://www.un-documents.net/ocf-02.htm

CEFIC: Enabling Responsible Innovations of Nanotechnologies; Stakeholder Engagement Workshop, Brussels, 24 June 2008, workshop documentation, 2008, http://www.cefic.org/Templates/shwStory.asp?NID=577&HID=582&PHID=577

Chubin, D. E. (1985). MISCONDUCT IN RESEARCH - AN ISSUE OF SCIENCE POLICY AND PRACTICE. Minerva, 23(2), 175-202.

Clarkson, G and De Korte, D, “The Problem of Patent Thickets in Emerging Technologies,” in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (1093), 180-200, 2006, http://www.nyas.org/annals/detail.asp?annalID=875

Cobb, D. (1980). Individuals, Collectives, and Moral Agency. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms International.

COMEST (World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology), “Nanotechnologies and Ethics: Policies and Actions,” UNESCO, Paris, 2007, http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=11371&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

Council of the European Union, “Nanosciences and Nanotechnologies – Council Conclusions”, in press release 12959/1/08 REV1, 2891 Council Meeting, Competitiveness, Brussels, 25-26 September 2008, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/intm/103101.pdf

Davies, J. Clarence, “Nanotechnology Oversight, an agenda for the new administration,” Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars, USA, http://www.nanotechproject.org/

Demos (2007). The nanodialogues Retrieved 5 March, 2009, from http://www.demos.co.uk/projects/thenanodialogues/overview

EEB & BEUC, “The path to sustainable use of chemicals in products: the European ecolabel as a signpost,” EEB Publ No 2008/014, Brussels, December 2008, http://docshare.beuc.org/docs/2/LFNHCGLDHGJJAOCBHOHLDJALPDBG9DBYBY9DW3571KM/BEUC/docs/DLS/2009-00102-01-E.pdf

EGE, “Ethics of Nanomedicine,” Opinion 21, European Group on Ethics, European Commission, Brussels, 2007, http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/index_en.htm

Eshleman, Andrew, “Moral Responsibility,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2004, http://www.science.uva.nl/~seop/entries/moral-responsibility/

ETC Group (2003). The Big Down: From Genomes to Atoms. Winnipeg: ETC Group.

ETC group, "The Potential Impacts of Nano-Scale Technologies on Commodity Markets: The Implications for Commodity Dependent Developing Countries". Trade-Related Agenda, Development and Equity (T.R.A.D.E.) Research Papers. Geneva, South Centre pp. 59, 2005, http://www.southcentre.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=267&Itemid=67

ETCgroup, “Nanotech’s ‘Second Nature’ Patents: Implications for the Global South,” ETCgroup communiqué, March-April and May-June 2005, www.etcgroup.org

ETUC resolution on nanotechnologies and nanomaterials, 26 June 2008: ETUC wants precautionary principle applied to nanotechnologies, ETUC, Brussels, 2008, http://www.etuc.org/a/5159?var_recherche=nano

European Commission, “Communication from the Commission on the precautionary principle,” COM(2000) 1 European Commission, Brussels, 02/02/2000

European Commission, “Commission Recommendation of 07/02/2008 on a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research”, European Commission, Brussels, C(2008) 424 Final http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/nanocode-rec_pe0894c_en.pdf

European Parliament, “Legislative resolution of 8 July 2008 on the Council Common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on food additives,” European Parliament, Brussels, 2008, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2008-0330+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN

European Parliament, “resolution of 4 September 2008 on the mid-term review of the European Environment and Health Action Plan 2004-2010,” European Parliament, Brussels, 2008, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P6-TA-2008-0410+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN&language=EN

Faunce Thomas, Murray Katherine, Naus Hitoshi, Bowman Diana, “Sunscreen Safety: The Precautionary Principle, The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration and Nanoparticles in Sunscreens,” in Nanoethics Vol 2, No. 3, 231-240, 2008, http://www.springerlink.com/content/h60j8027615v04m5/?p=189bf5c6bfa844c9ac5bfecf24a8db99&pi=1

Fleischer, T., & Grunwald, A. (2008). Making nanotechnology developments sustainable. A role for technology assessment? Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8-9), 889-898.

Flores, A., & Johnson, D. G. (1983). COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY AND PROFESSIONAL ROLES. Ethics, 93(3), 537-545.

FOE, “Out of the Laboratory and onto our Plates; Nanotechnology in Food and Agriculture,” Friends of the Earth Australia, Europe and USA, March 2008, http://www.foe.org/pdf/nano_food.pdf

Gallup Organisation: “Young People and Science,” Flash Eurobarometer 239, September / October 2008, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_239_sum_en.pdf 

Gilbert, M. (2000). Sociality and Responsibility: New Essays in Plural Subject Theory. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.

Grimshaw, D. J., J. Stilgoe, et al. (2006). Globalisation and the diffusion of nanotechnologies to help the poor. The Role of New Technologies in Potable Water Provision: A Stakeholder Workshop Approach - Can Nanotechnologies help achieve the millennium development target of halving the number of people without access to clean water by 2015? Report on the Nano-Dialogues held in Harare, Zimbabwe, 15, 16 and 22 July 2006. Rugby, U.K., Practical Action pp. 25. http://practicalaction.org/?id=nanodialogues

Grobe, Antje, Renn, Ortwin, Jaeger, Alexander, “Risk Governance of Nanotechnology Applications in Food and Cosmetics,” International Risk Governance Council, Geneva, 2008, http://www.irgc.org/IMG/pdf/IRGC_Report_FINAL_For_Web.pdf

Grunwald, A. (2008). Nanoparticles: Risk Management and the Precautionary Principle. In F. Jotterand (Ed.), Emerging Conceptual, Ethical and Policy Issues in Bionanotechnology (pp. 85-102). Berlin: Springer Science + Business Media.

Hanssen Lucien, Walhout Bart, and van Est Rinie, “Ten lessons for a nanodialogue,” Rathenau Institute, The Hague, 2008, http://www.rathenauinstituut.com/showpage.asp?steID=2&ID=3058

Hardin, R. (1988). Morality within the Limits of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Harremoës, P. (2005). Precautionary Principle. In C. Mitcham (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Sicnec and Technology Ethics (Vol. 3, pp. 1474-1479). Farmington, MI: Thomson Gale.

Health Council of the Netherlands (2006). Health significance of nanotechnologies. Publication no. 2006/06E. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.

Health Council of the Netherlands, “Prudent Precaution,” Health Council of the Netherlands, The Hague, 2008, publication no. 2008/18 www.gr.nl

Helland, A., & Kastenholz, H. (2008). Development of nanotechnology in light of sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8-9), 885-888.

Helland, A., Kastenholz, H., & Siegrist, M. (2008). Precaution in practice: Perceptions, procedures, and performance in the nanotech industry. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(3), 449-458.

Helland, A., Kastenholz, H., Thidell, A., Arnfalk, P., & Deppert, K. (2006). Nanoparticulate materials and regulatory policy in Europe: An analysis of stakeholder perspectives. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(5), 709-719.

Hullmann, Angela, “European activities in the field of ethical, legal and social aspects (ELSA) and governance of nanotechnology,” European Commission, Brussels, 1 October 2008 ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/elsa_governance_nano.pdf

IAASTD, “Agriculture at a Crossroads,” Volume I Global Summary for Decision Makers, Island Press, 2008, http://www.islandpress.org/iaastd and http://www.agassessment.org/index.cfm?Page=IAASTD%20Reports&ItemID=2713

ICCA, “Responsible Care Global Charter,” The International Council for Chemical Associations (ICCA), Brussels, 2006 www.icca-chem.org; http://www.icca-chem.org/pdf/Responsible%20Care%20Global%20Charter%20in%20English.pdf

ICSU, “Freedom, Responsibility and Universality of Science,” International Council for Science, Paris, October 2008, http://www.icsu.org/2_resourcecentre/RESOURCE_list_base.php4?rub=13

Joly, Pierre-Benoît, Rip, Arie: “A timely harvest,” Nature Vol 450 8 November 2007, p. 308

Jonas, Hans, “Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation” Frankfurt/M, 1979

Jonas, H. (1980). The Heuristics of Fear. In M. Kranzberg (Ed.), Ethics in an Age of Pervasive Technology. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

Joshi, S. (2008). Can nanotechnology improve the sustainability of biobased products? The case of layered silicate biopolymer nanocomposites. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(3), 474-489.

Kjolberg, K., Delgado-Ramos, G. C., Wickson, F., & Strand, R. (2008). Models of governance for converging technologies. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(1), 83-97.

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.

Kordecki, Knüppel, Meisinger, “Ethical aspects of nanotechnology,” Akzente 14, Evangelische Kirche Deutschland, 2007, http://www.ekd.de/agu/download/akzente_14_ethical_aspects_of_nanotechnology.pdf

Kuzma Jennifer and Besley John C, “Ethics of Risk Analysis and Regulatory Review: From Bio- to Nanotechnology,” in Nanoethics, Vol 2, No. 2, 149-162, 2008, http://www.springerlink.com/content/k0911n3110084508/?p=66ac8cbcede445de9e8bd4219986c579&pi=2

Lee, R., & Jose, D. (2008). Self-interest, self-restraint and corporate responsibility for nanotechnologies: Emerging dilemmas for modern managers. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(1), 113-125.

Lenk, H., & Maring, M. (2000). Responsibility and technology. In A. E. Auhagen (Ed.), Responsibility: The Many Faces of a Social Phenomenon (pp. 93-107). London: Routledge.

Lewis Sanford, Liroff Richard, Byrne Margaret, Booth Mary, Baue Bill, “Toxic Stock Syndrome,” IEHN, April 2008, www.iehn.org, http://www.iehn.org/publications.reports.toxicstock.php

Marchant, G. E., & Sylvester, D. J. (2006). Transnational models for regulation of nanotechnology. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, 34(4), 714-+.

Marris, Claire, Arie Rip, and Pierre-Benoît Joly, ‘Interactive Technology Assessment in the Real World: dual dynamics in an iTA exercise on genetically modified vines’, Science, Technology & Human Values 33(1) (2008) 77-100

May, L. (1996). The socially responsible self: Social theory and professional ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Meaney, M. E. (2006). Lessons from the sustainability movement: Toward an integrative decision-making framework for nanotechnology. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, 34(4), 682-688.

Miller, S. (2001). Social Action: A Teleological Account. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mitcham, C. (1995). THE CONCEPT OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - ITS ORIGINS AND AMBIVALENCE. Technology in Society, 17(3), 311-326.

Mitcham, C. (2003). Co-responsibility for research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics, 9(2), 273-290.

Ott, Ingrid, Papilloud, Christian, “Converging Institutions: Shaping Relationships between Nanotechnologies, Economy and Society,” in Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, Vol 27, No 6, 455-466 (2007), http://bst.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/27/6/455

Renn, O. (2005). White paper on risk governance: towards and integrative apporach. White paper no. 1. Geneva: International Risk Governance Council.

Renn, O., & Roco, M. (2006). Nanotechnology and risk governance. White paper no. 2. Geneva: International Risk Governance Council.

Renn, O., & Roco, M. C. (2006). Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 8(2), 153-191.

Responsible NanoCode, “The Responsible NanoCode; update May 2008,” www.responsiblenanocode.org

Rip, Arie: “Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists,” Science as Culture 15(4) (December 2006) 349-365

Rip, Arie: ‘Research Choices and Directions – in Changing Contexts’, in Marion Deblonde et al., Nano Researchers Facing Choices, Universitair Centrum Sint-Ignatius Antwerpen, June 2007, pp. 33-48. The Dialogue Series # 10

Rip, Arie: “Governance of new and emerging science and technology,” chapter in Peter Healey (ed.), Tomorrow’s People: Challenges of Radical Life Extension and Enhancement, London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publishers, 2009, pp. 209-214

Rizzuto Pat, “Increase expected in shareholder resolutions urging disclosure of nanomaterials, policies,” Bureau of National Affairs Daily environment report 15/01/2009, www.bna.com, http://www.merid.org/NDN/more.php?articleID=1654&search=%2FNDN%2Farchive.php%3FdoSearch%3D1%26items%3D20%26q%3D%26implications%255B%255D%3DIntellectual%2BProperty%2BRights%26submit%3DSearch%26sortField%3DPosted&scorePrecent=50

Rogers-Hayden, T., & Pidgeon, N. (2008). Developments in nanotechnology public engagement in the UK: 'upstream' towards sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8-9), 1010-1013.

Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering (2004). Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. London: The Royal Society.

Schlyter, Carl (rapporteur), “Draft report on regulatory aspects of nanomaterials (2008/2208(INI)),” Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, European Parliament, Brussels, 19 January 2009, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-418.270+01+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN

Schomberg, R. v. (2006). The precautionary principle and its normative challenges. In E. Fischer, J. Jones & R. v. Schomberg (Eds.), Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects (pp. 19-42). Cheltenham and Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

Schomberg, René von, “From the ethics of technology towards an ethics of knowledge policy and knowledge assessment,” European Commission Working Document EUR 22429, Brussels, 2007, http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/ethicsofknowledgepolicy_en.pdf

Sengul, H., Theis, T. L., & Ghosh, S. (2008). Toward sustainable nanoproducts: An overview of nanomanufacturing methods. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(3), 329-359.

Shand, Hope, "New Enclosures: Why Civil Societies and Governments Need to Look Beyond Life Patenting." The New Centennial Review  3(2): 187-204, http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/new_centennial_review/v003/3.2shand.html

Smiley, Marion, “Collective Responsibility,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 8 August 2005, http://plato.stanford.edu/, http://www.science.uva.nl/~seop/entries/collective-responsibility/

So AD, Sampat BN, Rai AK, Cook-Degan R, Reichman JH, Weisman R, Kapczynski A, “Is Bayh-Dole Good for Developing Countries? Lessons from the US Experience,” in PLoS Biology 6(10), October 2008, http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0060262&ct=1&SESSID=68fbf383b835b7c4d47ae9ffbc7096d2

Steward, F., Tsoi, J. C. S., & Coles, A. M. (2008). Innovation and sustainability in print-on-paper: a comparison of nanoparticle and deinking niches as emergent sociotechnical networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8-9), 957-966.

Stoddart, A. (2006). The safety of nanomaterials needs to be demonstrated on the precautionary principle - Nanotechnology - friend or foe? Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, 4(17), 3195-3195.

Sweet, L., & Strohm, B. (2006). Nanotechnology - Life-cycle risk management. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 12(3), 528-551.

Swierstra, Tsjalling, Rip, Arie: “Nano-ethics as NEST-ethics: patterns of moral argumentation about new and emerging science and technology,” NanoEthics 1 (2007) 3-20

Swiss RE (2004). Nanotechnology - Small Matter, Many Unknowns. Zürich: Swiss Reinsurance Company.

Takemura, M. (2008). Japan's engagement in health, environmental and societal aspects of nanotechnology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8-9), 1003-1005.

Ten Have, Henk (ed), “Nanotechnologies, Ethics and Politics,” Ethics Series, UNESCO, Paris, 2007, http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=10886&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html 

Throne-Holst, H., & Sto, E. (2008). Who should be precautionary? Governance of nanotechnology in the risk society. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(1), 99-112.

Tomellini, Renzo, Giordani, Julien, “Third International Dialogue on Responsible Research and Development of Nanotechnology,” Brussels, 11-12 March 2008, http://cordis.europa.eu/nanotechnology/src/intldialogue.htm

Tyshenko, M. G., & Krewski, D. (2008). A risk management framework for the regulation of nanomaterials. International Journal of Nanotechnology, 5(1), 143-160.

UNESCO, “The Ethics and Politics of Nanotechnology,” UNESCO, Paris, 2006, http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=9648&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html

United Nations Environment Programme (1992). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development Retrieved 4 March, 2009, from http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?documentid=78&articleid=1163

van Lente, H., & van Til, J. I. (2008). Articulation of sustainability in the emerging field of nanocoatings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8-9), 967-976.

von Gleich, A., Steinfeldt, M., & Petschow, U. (2008). A suggested three-tiered approach to assessing the implications of nanotechnology and influencing its development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8-9), 899-909.

Wardak, A., & Gorman, M. E. (2006). Using trading zones and life cycle analysis to understand nanotechnology regulation. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics, 34(4), 695-+.

Werner, Micha, “Verantwortung,” in Düwell, Marcus, Hübenthal, Christopher & Werner, Micha, “Handbuch Ethik,” J.B. Metzler, 2006, p541-547

Wolbring (2008) Peer Reviewed Why NBIC? Why human performance enhancement? European Journal of Social Science Research, Vol 21,No.1,pp.25-40

Wolbring, G. (2007). Nano-Engagement: Some Critical Issues. Journal of Health and Development, 3(1-2), 9-29.

Zhao, F., Zhao, Y. L., & Wang, C. (2008). Activities related to health, environmental and societal aspects of nanotechnology in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8-9), 1000-1002.

Zweck, A., Bachmann, G., Luther, W., & Ploetz, C. (2008). Nanotechnology in Germany: from forecasting to technological assessment to sustainability studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(8-9), 977-987.