Skip to content

Report chapters

reportSocietal Issues
1 Societal Issues

"Societal Issues", is a practical implementation of the co-evolution of technology and society. Co-evolution means awareness of the other's concerns plus taking these concerns into account (to some extent). It has the objective to monitor both the ethical and societal impact of N&N and the impact that societal developments and ethical reflection can have on N&N developments. It will also observe the development by various national and international organisations of codes of conduct for nanotechnology, or of other activities related to ethics; and the eventual take-up of such codes.

Year 1: Individual and Collective Responsibility

Year 2: Nanobiomedical ethics

Year 3: ICT and security

Year 4: Communication between scientists, technology, and society

Each year, the following deliverables will be produced:

  • An annual report summarising relevant findings of the technical and economic reports produced in other workpackages, as well as ethical and social science literature and European and national project results on the theme of the year.
  • Four interviews with social and natural scientists, industry and civil society representatives on actual issues related to the theme of the year.
  • Participation in the annual symposium discussing the project results with experts and stakeholders.
  •  Liaison with relevant projects and actors in Europe and its member states, made visible in weblinks, by interviewing and inviting representatives to ObservatoryNano symposia and by attending strategic events organised by them.

In the first year, an ethics toolkit has been developed which will now be tested on case studies supplied by nanotechnology researchers and stakeholders during the whole project. In the fourth year, the annual report will discuss the results of testing the toolkit.

Contact details:

Coordinator "Societal Issues" Ineke Malsch postbus@malsch.demon.nl

Document details:

Visits: 294, Published on: November, 30th 1999, 12:00 AM GMT+0100, Last edit: 2010-02-23 15:46:24 Size: 2 KByte

Tags: ELSA, Ethics, Societal issues

Other documents in this catalogue entry:

IconInterview with Arie Rip, University of Twente

A conversation on governance of nanotechnology - Individual and collective responsibility for nanotechnology - Interview with Arie Rip, University of...

23,758 Characters
IconInterview with Tony Musu, European Trade Union Institute

"We don't want another asbestos drama" - Individual and collective responsibility for nanotechnology - Interview with Tony Musu, European Trade Union...

17,283 Characters
IconInterview with Lena Perenius, CEFIC

CEFIC invites stakeholders to nano-dialogue - Individual and collective responsibility for nanotechnology. Dr Lena Perenius is Executive Director Programme Product Stewardship at the European Chemical Industry Council...

18,271 Characters
IconInterview with Lena Perenius, CEFIC

CEFIC invites stakeholders to nano-dialogue - Individual and collective responsibility for nanotechnology. Dr Lena Perenius is Executive Director Programme Product Stewardship at the European Chemical Industry Council...

IconDownload file36 KByte
IconWe don\'t Want Another Asbestos Drama

On 26 June 2008, the executive committee of the European Trade Union Confederation ETUC adopted a resolution on nanotechnologies and nanomaterials. ETUC wants the precautionary principle to be applied to nanotechnologies. Tony Musu is responsible for the working group which prepared this...

IconDownload file37 KByte
IconEnhancing Reflectivity about Priorities in Nanoscience

Professor Richard Jones, the strategic advisor for nanotechnology to the UK funding council for Engineering and Physical Sciences EPSRC, has contributed extensively to the debate on responsible nanotechnology. A key piece is “Public Engagement and Nanotechnology, The UK Experience” (Jones, 2009), in which he reviews public engagement activities with nanotechnology in the UK including the EPSRC...

IconDownload file39 KByte

Jump back to top